CH 3: Arriving at the top of the pyramid

14837486852_8642d2db48_z
JamesJames Rojas is an urban planner, community activist, and artist. He has developed an innovative public-engagement and community-visioning tool that uses art-making, imagination, storytelling, and play as its media. He is also one of the few nationally recognized urban planners to examine Latino cultural influences on urban design and sustainability in the US. He has written and lectured extensively on how culture and immigration are transforming the American front yard and landscape, and he is the founder of the Latino Urban Forum, an advocacy group dedicated to increasing awareness on planning and design issues facing low-income Latinos. Read more about James here.

James Rojas on Arrival City Chapter 3: Arriving at the top of the pyramid

What separates the American arrival city from the European arrival city is the power that immigrants, especially Latinos, have in transforming the urban/suburban landscape. Latinos are creating a new design lexicon for Los Angeles’s tired old suburbs and across the US that middle class whites are abandoning for urban living. Latinos moving into these car-centric suburbs are transforming them with their cultural behaviour patterns. Through their socializing, walking, biking, using public transportation, they are erasing the car-culture scale of these suburbs. This growth of the Latino population in the US will in a few dozens years make a new American suburban standard. Arabs in Paris, Indians in London, or the Turks in Berlin will have great difficulty transforming the civic, cultural, and physical identity of these cities but Latinos can and will change the profile of vast American suburban landscapes. Latino immigration is also changing the urban/suburban landscapes of their homelands because these returning immigrants bring back new ways of thinking about space from their time in the US which is developing a Pan-American urbanism.

Latino vernacular

The vast majority of America’s single-family housing was built in the twentieth century with values and spatial requirements that met the social, cultural, design, and economic needs and dreams of America’s working- and middle-classes. As great numbers of Latino immigrants move into those homes, they bring attitudes towards housing, land, and public space that often conflict with how the neighborhoods and houses were originally planned, zoned, designed, and constructed.

Latinos moving into single-family homes add their cultural living patterns to the American spatial forms to create “Latino vernacular.” This vernacular offers cultural, economic, and environmental solutions to the residents’ needs as they customize and personalize their homes. Every change Latinos make to their homes, no matter how small, has meaning and purpose, representing the struggles, triumphs, everyday habits, and beliefs of the new working class residents.

Latino vernacular synthesizes cultural styles that are neither “Spanish” (as the general public views it) nor Anglo-American. The beauty of the vernacular cannot be measured by any architectural standard but rather by life’s experiences, expressions, and adaptations. The vernacular represents Latinos’ adaptation to their environment.

Public vs. private; outdoor vs. indoor

Many Latinos come from the rural places of Mexico or Latin America where social, cultural — and to some extent economic — life revolves around the zócalo, or plaza. The plaza becomes an extension of residents’ home life. The dialogue between home and plaza —which is very apparent in the physical structures of Latin American settlements — manifests itself in the way Latinos redesign their single-family homes in the U.S.

Because of warm weather and Spanish urban design precedents, the traditional Mexican courtyard home is designed with a “patio” or interior courtyard, which helps ventilate the interior of the home and floods it with light. With most rooms facing the patio, it becomes the physical focus of the home.

By contrast, the American house has a strong linear movement that begins at the front of the house and works its way back. American rooms are arranged beginning with the “public” (the living room) in front, to the private (the bedrooms) in back. In the Mexican house, the focus is on being either inside or outside, not in front or in back. Privacy is usually not an issue.

Front yard as plaza

Nowhere else in the Latino vernacular home is Mexican use of space so illuminated and celebrated than in the enclosed front yard or plaza. As Mexican immigrants settled into their new homes, the American front yards became a space for cultural identity.

The Mexican brings a new interpretation to the American front yard (la yarda) because many homes in Mexico don’t have them. Depending on the practical needs of the owners, the use and design of the front yards vary from elaborate courtyard gardens reminiscent of Mexico to working spaces. La yarda reflects Mexican cultural values applied to American suburban form.

The personalization of la yarda by the residents, along with the enclosing fences, has greatly changed the appearance of the front yards and the street. In Latino neighborhoods, enclosed front yards are now so dominant that they have altered the general physical characteristics of the neighborhoods and the residents’ behavior patterns. The continuous green, park-like setting that symbolized the American suburban front yard has been cut into individual slices in East Los Angeles. These “slices” readily allow for individuality and sociability and create diversity.

In many middle-class American neighborhoods, the appearance of the front yard is the standard for acceptance. In Latino neighborhoods, acceptance is not based on appearance of the front yard but on physical and social contact with neighbors. In contrast with anonymous lawns, Latino front yards are personal vignettes of the owners’ lives.

Fences as social catalyst

The visible expanse of lawn fronting American suburban houses is a symbol of ownership and privacy. It is also a psychological barrier that separates the private space of the home from the public space of the street. People do not walk on another person’s front lawn unless they are invited to. While one can find fences in many front yards across America, the egalitarian front yard has led many to think of fences in terms of exclusion, seclusion, or security — barriers against the world. By contrast, in Latino neighborhoods and barrios, fences bring neighbors and pedestrians together. Front-yard fences have become cultural icons and places for social interaction.

Front porches are important to Latinos

In most American homes, the use and importance of the front porch has declined. But for Latinos, the front porch is a critical, valued connection between outdoor-indoor space and public-private space. In Latin America, rooms such as the laundry room are located outside the enclosed house; so the use of outdoor space as part of the home is a common practice. Thus the use and desire for outside space via the front porch comes naturally to Latinos.

Latino front porches are used to check out what’s happening on the street, to socialize with family and friends, for extra storage, as a place for toddlers to play, to sell services or things, and as celebratory spaces. Therefore porches are redesigned or enlarged to meet those needs.

The porch is where seniors sit to watch the world go by, where teenagers wait for something to happen, where a mother sits to watch her children play in the front yard, where a man might meet his friends after work, or even a place were you give haircuts! These uses make the front porch an enduring space that adds to social activity on the street.

The Latino vernacular transforms and sustains the street

Latino single-family houses “communicate” with each other by sharing a cultural understanding expressed through the built environment. The residents communicate with each other via the front yard. By building fences they bind together adjacent homes. By adding and enlarging front porches, they extend the household into the front yard. These physical changes allow and reinforce the social connections and the heavy use of the front yard. The entire street now functions as a “suburban” plaza where every resident can interact with the public from his or her front yard. Thus Latinos have transformed car-oriented suburban blocks to walkable and socially sustainable places.

2 Comments Add yours

  1. Maryama Ali says:

    Informative and thought provoking would be the choice of words when describe chapter three of Arrival City. Mario’s story was executed with enough information and informative backing of an arrival city of that emerged solely based on immigration and “suburbanization”. I enjoyed Saunders’s argument that cities are potentially to be expected to fail due to the high levels of violence however, an arrival can miraculously turned around, which was correct for L.A’s case however, it was a 20 year process to conclude with that result.

    The chapter began to analyze a subsection of Los Angeles (or known to be West Adams or North corner of South America) as a major source of income for the rural communities from where the immigrated urbanities came from. Mario’s story allowed the readers like myself to understand the hardships one had to go though in a newly acclaimed arrival city such as L. A. He’s been through the cities beginnings and rough middles like violence, poverty, and lack of state visibility. His story (which is an example of many stores in the city) was a clear definition of perseverance within the world of entrepreneurship’. As Saunders’s puts it, Mario’s story is echoed “across the western world, in the outskirts, the low-rent suburbs, the housing-project districts and the abandoned inner-city enclaves of North America’s and Europe’s cities” (p. 81-2). This particular chapter ties what Saunders is trying to state in chapter 1 and 2 which illustrated how those who immigrate into heavily populated and diverse cities tend to be individuals from rural areas of the world.

    Mario and many other Central Americans like himself thrive off of the “booming transnational property trade, driven by a population who aspire to entrepreneurship, education and home ownership” (p. 81). However, there is a struggle attached to that goal which is stated in the third quarter of the chapter which analyzes the hardships of poverty, disassociation as well as fear that individuals from rural countries have to go through when immigrating into rural countries without actual permission by the state (citizenship). Saunders’s is very passionate about immigration and citizenship laws for those who are illegal immigrants but have managed to create an growing arrival city. The United States has a strong case with this but what is Canada’s involvement? Do we have a similar case? Saunders does address that Toronto shares the same qualities as L.A but is it to the exact extent as L.A?

    Mario’s and many other community members have struggled to gain asylum from their war conflicted homes in Centre America, this topic was very much covered on the last portion of the chapter. From my take on his information I found it to touching home for me. Then again I may not be the right generation that can vocally represent those who have fled their homes to start a new however, I can say that my parents have. They chose the suburbs to get away from the busy streets of downtown however, I later came to the fact that they chose our little home so that we can be a part of a safe and prominently African community that is growing on its own compared to the rest of Toronto. To be honest I wouldn’t mind living anywhere else in the city but, my parents actually feel “right back home” and productive when living in the “burbs”.

  2. zalrb says:

    I want to start off by saying that I found this chapter intriguing to say the least. The inclusion of real life stories and experiences in each chapter has become something I look forward to when reading Arrival City. There are many things that stood out to me in this chapter, the first being a brutally honest statement about the changing nature of poverty and the experience of moving out of rural life and into the city. The author outlines that the income and absolute poverty levels change as years go by, however, the frustrations and dangers of migration remain the same. This struck me in the sense that the alleviation of poverty is relative and can change over time but the suffering that causes a family to move out of their home remains the same, unchanging. This means that there have been no attempts to create a change in rural communities, one which would allow residents to live a fulfilling life. The thought that there is a lack of progress in that regard is something that is truly saddening.

    I found myself highlighting almost every sentence in this chapter simply because I enjoyed not only the parallels drawn between politics and the arrival city but the effect that immigration policies have on migrants. The presence of the likes of Mario Martinez outline a thought process in which highlights that there should be no reason to have large masses of the developing world’s rural poor in the cities of the West. This thought process is accompanied by the growing management of borders, selective immigration and the use of high technology information. All of which have increased as a result of globalization, from this we see a dramatic rise in the interconnectedness of world cities and in return an interconnectedness of processes that block out rural migrants.

    Furthermore, Saunders also outlines the move away from policies that allow unskilled migrants to enter into a country. He interestingly argues that although governments like Canada strive to bring in only urban, university educated elites and disallow individuals who come from rural areas, that trend will soon disappear. This is because countries in the West, Canada being a prime example, will soon experience labour shortages in which will create a shift in immigration policies to allow for the entry of unskilled workers. As for the people that are successful in moving, this chapter outlines that educated workers have a hard time finding a job in their profession and usually suffer from both unemployment and poverty. What I found intriguing is the contradiction that Saunders outlines in relation to education credentials of foreigners in the West. He states that bringing in only urban and educated elites is a waste of human potential since immigrants often attain their degrees back home at universities that have been funded by foreign governments. Aid is provided in order to help foster medical, legal and technical knowledge in the developing world, however, the outcome of these programs has been that graduates end up in unskilled, lower paid professions totally unrelated to their field. The problems that rise out of the lack of accreditation which immigrants face has been something that I have learned as a Politics and Governance student since year one. What I didn’t know and learned from this chapter is that universities in the developing world are funded by foreign governments through aid. Of course there is more to this, but as an individual who has never been exposed to such a fact, I was shocked. I also couldn’t help but sympathize with people who uproot their whole lives in hopes of a better future only to be suddenly faced with such policies.

    All in all, this chapter was enlightening and enjoyable, looking forward to the next one!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s